septic tank: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tank
Weight: 0.80
, plumbing
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.62
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings gas tank
Weight: 0.38
, water heater
Weight: 0.36
, toilet tank
Weight: 0.34
, gallon
Weight: 0.34
, sprinkler
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.77
were used in good way 0.76
be good at lvl45 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tank, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tank, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sprinkler, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(plumbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(sprinkler, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sprinkler, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(septic tank, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(septic tank, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tank, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sprinkler, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tank, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(plumbing, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(septic tank, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)