serf: was important to fedualism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents peasant
Weight: 0.57
, slave
Weight: 0.52
, word
Weight: 0.46
, person
Weight: 0.45
Siblings bondage
Weight: 0.30
, servant
Weight: 0.30
, beggar
Weight: 0.30
, capitalism
Weight: 0.30
, dalai lama
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to fedualism 1.00
were important to system 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(serf, was important to fedualism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(peasant, were important to system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(peasant, were important to system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(peasant, were important to system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(serf, was important to fedualism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(serf, was important to fedualism)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(serf, were important to system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(serf, were important to system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(serf, were important to system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(serf, were important to system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(serf, was important to fedualism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(serf, was important to fedualism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peasant, were important to system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(serf, was important to fedualism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(peasant, were important to system)