series: be in tennis work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents world series
Weight: 0.74
, television series
Weight: 0.64
, program
Weight: 0.60
, title
Weight: 0.59
Siblings star wars
Weight: 0.69
, star trek
Weight: 0.68
, run
Weight: 0.64
, mass effect
Weight: 0.63
, episode
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in tennis work 1.00
playing cricket 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(run, playing cricket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(run, playing cricket)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(run, playing cricket)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(series, be in tennis work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(series, be in tennis work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(series, be in tennis work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(series, be in tennis work)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(run, playing cricket)