service: lose money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose money 1.00
be out of money 0.85
make money 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(postal service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, lose money)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(postal service, lose money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(postal service, lose money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(postal service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(service, lose money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(service, lose money)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(service, be out of money)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(service, be out of money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(service, be out of money)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(service, be out of money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(service, lose money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, lose money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(postal service, lose money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, lose money)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(postal service, lose money)