sesame street: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kid
Weight: 0.65
, character
Weight: 0.64
, child
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
, show
Weight: 0.61
Siblings spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, sweet
Weight: 0.32
, black cat
Weight: 0.32
, las vegas
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sesame street, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality questions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sesame street, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sesame street, has quality questions)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sesame street, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sesame street, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)