sesame street: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kid
Weight: 0.65
, character
Weight: 0.64
, child
Weight: 0.63
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
, show
Weight: 0.61
Siblings spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.32
, sweet
Weight: 0.32
, black cat
Weight: 0.32
, las vegas
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sesame street, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sesame street, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sesame street, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sesame street, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sesame street, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sesame street, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sesame street, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)