set: be important in economics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents setting
Weight: 0.70
, option
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
Siblings empty set
Weight: 0.65
, ordinal number
Weight: 0.48
, mirage
Weight: 0.46
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, put
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in economics 1.00
be important in mathematics 0.81
be part of theology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(concept, be part of theology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(set, be important in economics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(concept, be part of theology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(concept, be part of theology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(concept, be part of theology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(set, be important in economics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(set, be important in economics)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(set, be important in mathematics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(set, be important in mathematics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(set, be important in mathematics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(set, be important in mathematics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(set, be important in economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(set, be important in economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(concept, be part of theology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(set, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(concept, be part of theology)