set: have similar names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents setting
Weight: 0.70
, option
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
Siblings empty set
Weight: 0.65
, ordinal number
Weight: 0.48
, mirage
Weight: 0.46
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, put
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have similar names 1.00
have names 0.92
be different 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(setting, be different)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(set, have similar names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(setting, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(setting, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(setting, be different)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(set, have similar names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(set, have similar names)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(set, have names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(set, have names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(set, have names)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(set, have names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(set, have similar names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(set, have similar names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(setting, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(set, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(setting, be different)