setting: contribute to effectiveness of story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.58
, detail
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings set
Weight: 0.70
, contrast
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.62
, classroom
Weight: 0.61
, garden
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to effectiveness of story 1.00
contribute to effectiveness 0.94
be important to story 0.77
be important in story 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in story)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in story)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(setting, contribute to effectiveness)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(setting, be important to story)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(setting, be important in story)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(setting, be important in story)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(setting, be important to story)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(setting, be important in story)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(setting, be important to story)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(setting, be important in story)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(setting, be important to story)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in story)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(setting, contribute to effectiveness of story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in story)