sewing: have sold machines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents work
Weight: 0.64
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, trade
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.57
Siblings quilting
Weight: 0.35
, needlework
Weight: 0.35
, woodworking
Weight: 0.35
, knitting
Weight: 0.35
, crocheting
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sold machines 1.00
have sold together machines 0.95
is machine 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(quilting, is machine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(quilting, is machine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(quilting, is machine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(sewing, have sold machines)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sewing, have sold together machines)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sewing, have sold together machines)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sewing, have sold together machines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(sewing, have sold together machines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(sewing, is machine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(sewing, is machine)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sewing, is machine)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sewing, is machine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sewing, have sold machines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sewing, have sold machines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sewing, have sold machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(quilting, is machine)