sex: be important in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.68
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, taboo
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
Siblings sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.72
, escort service
Weight: 0.55
, indecent exposure
Weight: 0.54
, blowjob
Weight: 0.52
, transgender
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationship 1.00
be important to relationship 1.00
be good in relationship 0.97
be necessary in relationship 0.94
be vital in relationship 0.94
change relationship 0.92
be healthy for relationship 0.91
be in term relationship 0.90
evolve in relationship 0.89
make relationship stronger 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(sex, be important in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(sex, be important to relationship)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important to relationship)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sex, be important to relationship)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sex, make relationship stronger)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sex, be important to relationship)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sex, make relationship stronger)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sex, make relationship stronger)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sex, make relationship stronger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sex, be important in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)