sex: be protrayed frequently in modern movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.68
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, taboo
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
Siblings sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.72
, escort service
Weight: 0.55
, indecent exposure
Weight: 0.54
, blowjob
Weight: 0.52
, transgender
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protrayed frequently in modern movies 1.00
be protrayed frequently in tv 0.90
be in films 0.76
be much more addicting than movies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tv show, be much more addicting than movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tv show, be much more addicting than movies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tv show, be much more addicting than movies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(tv show, be much more addicting than movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in tv)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tv show, be much more addicting than movies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(sex, be protrayed frequently in modern movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tv show, be much more addicting than movies)