sex: make relationship stronger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.68
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, taboo
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
Siblings sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.72
, escort service
Weight: 0.55
, indecent exposure
Weight: 0.54
, blowjob
Weight: 0.52
, transgender
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
make relationship stronger 1.00
be good in relationship 0.91
be important in relationship 0.89
be important to relationship 0.89
be healthy for relationship 0.88
change relationship 0.87
be necessary in relationship 0.87
evolve in relationship 0.86
be vital in relationship 0.84
be in term relationship 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sex, make relationship stronger)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important in relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sex, be important to relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(sex, be important in relationship)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(sex, be important to relationship)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sex, be important in relationship)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sex, be important to relationship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sex, be important in relationship)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(sex, be important to relationship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sex, make relationship stronger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sex, make relationship stronger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sex, make relationship stronger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sexual intercourse, be important in relationship)