sexual assault: be problem in military

Related concepts

Parents	sexual activity Weight: 0.76 , felony Weight: 0.72 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.72 , assault Weight: 0.70
Siblings	rape Weight: 0.67 , robbery Weight: 0.62 , sexual intercourse Weight: 0.42 , sex Weight: 0.38 , unprotected sex Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in military	1.00
occur in military	0.84
has state problem	0.83
be in army	0.80
increase in army	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(assault, occur in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(assault, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(assault, increase in army) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(assault, be problem in military)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(assault, occur in military)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(assault, increase in army)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(assault, be problem in military)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(assault, occur in military)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(assault, increase in army)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(assault, occur in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(assault, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(assault, increase in army) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(robbery, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sexual assault, occur in military)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(sexual assault, increase in army)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(sexual assault, occur in military)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, occur in military)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state problem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, increase in army)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(sexual assault, increase in army)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, increase in army)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(sexual assault, be in army)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be in army)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(sexual assault, be in army)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be in army)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, occur in military)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Salient(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(assault, increase in army)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(assault, occur in military)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(assault, be problem in military)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(assault, occur in military)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(sexual assault, be problem in military) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(assault, increase in army)