sexual assault: has state condition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.76
, felony
Weight: 0.72
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.72
, assault
Weight: 0.70
Siblings rape
Weight: 0.67
, robbery
Weight: 0.62
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.42
, sex
Weight: 0.38
, unprotected sex
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state condition 1.00
is pre condition 0.88
is existing condition 0.88
is pre existing condition 0.83
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(assault, is existing condition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, is pre condition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(assault, has state condition)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, is pre condition)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(assault, is existing condition)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state condition)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(assault, is existing condition)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre condition)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(assault, is existing condition)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, is pre condition)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre condition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(assault, is pre condition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(assault, is existing condition)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(assault, is pre existing condition)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(assault, is pre condition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(assault, is existing condition)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(assault, is pre existing condition)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)