sexual assault: is issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.76
, felony
Weight: 0.72
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.72
, assault
Weight: 0.70
Siblings rape
Weight: 0.67
, robbery
Weight: 0.62
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.42
, sex
Weight: 0.38
, unprotected sex
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is issue 1.00
is justice issue 0.82
is partisan issue 0.79
has state problem 0.78
is social justice issue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(assault, is justice issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(assault, is social justice issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(assault, is issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(assault, is justice issue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(assault, is social justice issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(assault, is social justice issue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is partisan issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(assault, is justice issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(assault, is issue)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is issue)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(robbery, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sexual harassment, is issue)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(assault, is justice issue)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(assault, is partisan issue)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(assault, is social justice issue)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(robbery, is issue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(robbery, is issue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(robbery, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(robbery, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is issue)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is justice issue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is justice issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is social justice issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is justice issue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is justice issue)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is social justice issue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is social justice issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is social justice issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is partisan issue)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assault, is issue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(assault, is justice issue)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(assault, is partisan issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(assault, is social justice issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(robbery, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(robbery, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(assault, is issue)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(assault, is justice issue)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(assault, is partisan issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(sexual assault, is issue)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(assault, is social justice issue)