sexual assault: is pre existing condition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.76
, felony
Weight: 0.72
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.72
, assault
Weight: 0.70
Siblings rape
Weight: 0.67
, robbery
Weight: 0.62
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.42
, sex
Weight: 0.38
, unprotected sex
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pre existing condition 1.00
is existing condition 0.95
is pre condition 0.94
has state condition 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(assault, is existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, is pre condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(assault, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(assault, has state condition)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(assault, is pre condition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(assault, is existing condition)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre existing condition)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state condition)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(assault, is existing condition)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(assault, is pre condition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(assault, is existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(assault, is pre condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(assault, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is pre condition)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state condition)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, is existing condition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state condition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(assault, is pre condition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(assault, is existing condition)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(assault, is pre existing condition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(assault, is pre condition)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(assault, has state condition)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(assault, is existing condition)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(sexual assault, is pre existing condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(assault, is pre existing condition)