sexual harassment: be in prisons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in prisons 1.00
be common in prisons 0.95
be in female prisons 0.94
be in prison 0.83
be in prison go 0.82
be allowed in prison 0.81
be in prison acceptable 0.78
be committed in prison 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(crime, be committed in prison) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(crime, be in prison)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(crime, be committed in prison)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(crime, be committed in prison)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(rape, be common in prisons)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rape, be in prison go)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rape, be allowed in prison)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(crime, be committed in prison) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(rape, be common in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rape, be common in prisons)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(rape, be in prison go) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(rape, be in prison go)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(rape, be allowed in prison) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rape, be allowed in prison)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be in prisons)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, be in prison)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crime, be committed in prison)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(rape, be common in prisons)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rape, be in prison go)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rape, be allowed in prison)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, be in prison)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crime, be committed in prison)