sexual harassment: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.97
be problem in workplace 0.92
be in workplace difficult 0.91
be committed in workplace 0.85
be ethical issue in workplace 0.85
be unethical behaviour in workplace 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(behavior, be in workplace)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be in workplace)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(behavior, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(behavior, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be committed in workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be ethical issue in workplace)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be important in workplace)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace difficult)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be problem in workplace)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(behavior, be important in workplace)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be in workplace)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(sexual harassment, be in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(behavior, be important in workplace)