sexual harassment: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
considered wrong 0.86
be considered wrong 0.86
has quality good 0.85
is morally wrong 0.80
is bad if 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(complaint, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(rape, be considered wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rape, considered wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rape, is morally wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(bullying, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(flirting, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(rape, be considered wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(rape, be considered wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bullying, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bullying, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(flirting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rape, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(rape, has quality wrong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(rape, considered wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(rape, considered wrong)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(rape, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rape, is morally wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rape, has quality wrong)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(rape, be considered wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rape, considered wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(flirting, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bullying, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(flirting, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rape, is morally wrong)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sexual harassment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)