sexual harassment: is social problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social problem 1.00
be considered social problem 0.96
fear of is social problem 0.93
fear of is serious social problem 0.91
is social issue 0.90
is social 0.88
be considered as social issue 0.86
is social phenomenon 0.86
has state problem 0.85
is big problem 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(crime, fear of is serious social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(crime, is social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crime, is social)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(crime, fear of is serious social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(crime, fear of is serious social problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crime, is social problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is big problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bullying, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(crime, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(crime, fear of is serious social problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, is social)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be considered as social issue)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(sexual assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bullying, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bullying, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(bullying, is big problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bullying, is big problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(crime, is social)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(crime, fear of is serious social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(bullying, has state problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bullying, is big problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(crime, is social problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, be considered as social issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(crime, is social)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(crime, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sexual assault, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sexual harassment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(crime, fear of is serious social problem)