sexual harassment: is unethical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual assault
Weight: 0.77
, complaint
Weight: 0.70
, crime
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.69
Siblings flirting
Weight: 0.54
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.39
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.38
, rape
Weight: 0.37
, bullying
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unethical 1.00
be unethical behaviour in workplace 0.90
is immoral 0.84
is illegal 0.78
be considered illegal 0.76
is morally wrong 0.76
is unacceptable 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rape, is morally wrong)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rape, be considered illegal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is illegal)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rape, is illegal)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bullying, is unacceptable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rape, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(rape, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(bullying, is unacceptable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bullying, is unacceptable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rape, be considered illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(rape, be considered illegal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(bullying, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bullying, is illegal)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(rape, is morally wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rape, is morally wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be unethical behaviour in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, is unethical)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(rape, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(bullying, is unacceptable)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rape, be considered illegal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bullying, is illegal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, is unethical) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rape, is morally wrong)