shake: is cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, ice cream
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.51
, show
Weight: 0.50
Siblings rattle
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, rip
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheap 1.00
is cheaper 0.83
is expensive 0.79
be cheaper than nug 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shake, is cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rip, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(shake, is cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rip, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rip, is cheap)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(nail polish, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nail polish, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shake, is cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shake, is cheaper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(shake, is cheaper)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shake, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shake, is expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(shake, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shake, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheaper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shake, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shake, is cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rip, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nail polish, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shake, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)