shampoo: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be harmful to animals 0.77
be tested without animals 0.76
be harmful to water animals 0.76
be tested on animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(product, be tested on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(product, be tested without animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(product, be tested without animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(product, be tested on animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(product, be tested without animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(product, be tested on animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be tested on animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(product, be tested without animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(product, be tested on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(deodorant, be tested on animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be tested on animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(shampoo, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(product, be tested without animals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(product, be tested on animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(deodorant, be tested on animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(product, be tested without animals)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(product, be tested on animals)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(shampoo, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)