shampoo: be better than others

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than others 1.00
has quality better 0.81
be cheaper online than than store 0.78
get smaller 0.77
perform better in hard water 0.76
be less effective in hard water 0.76
be more quality than chinese 0.75
work better in hot water 0.75
perform better in water 0.75
be better than powder 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(detergent, be better than powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(detergent, work better in hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(detergent, perform better in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(detergent, perform better in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(detergent, perform better in water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than powder)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(soap, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(detergent, perform better in water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than powder)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(detergent, be better than powder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(detergent, work better in hot water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(detergent, perform better in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(detergent, perform better in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(shampoo, be better than others)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than powder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in water)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than powder)