shampoo: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be cheap on snapdeal 0.77
cost more 0.76
be more expensive in australia 0.76
be cheaper online than than store 0.76
cost 99 0.76
need cost 0.76
be cheaper on ebay 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, be more expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(product, be cheaper on ebay)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(product, be cheaper on ebay)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(product, cost more)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(product, be more expensive in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheaper on ebay)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(product, be more expensive in australia)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, cost more)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lotion, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, be more expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(product, be cheaper on ebay)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lotion, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lotion, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mouthwash, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(deodorant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(deodorant, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(shampoo, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper on ebay)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, be more expensive in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lotion, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(deodorant, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper on ebay)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(shampoo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, be more expensive in australia)