shape: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hourglass
Weight: 0.66
, candy cane
Weight: 0.65
, sphere
Weight: 0.64
, spiral
Weight: 0.63
, straight line
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality right 0.90
has quality system 0.84
has shape solid 0.79
has quality function 0.78
be better than quantity 0.77
be bad on snapchat 0.76
be bad on instagram 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality system)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(quality, be better than quantity)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(quality, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(quality, be better than quantity)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straight line, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(shape, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(shape, has quality right)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality right)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(shape, has quality right)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality right)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(shape, has shape solid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(shape, has shape solid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(shape, has shape solid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(shape, has shape solid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(shape, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(quality, has quality system)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(shape, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, be better than quantity)