sharing: be in relationship

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.57
, value
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.32
, service station
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, cooperation
Weight: 0.31
, chat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in relationship 1.00
be to friendship 0.84
is important to study of relations 0.79
is important to study of public relations 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(value, is important to study of public relations)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sharing, be in relationship)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(value, is important to study of public relations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(value, is important to study of public relations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(value, is important to study of public relations)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sharing, be in relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sharing, be in relationship)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sharing, be to friendship)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sharing, be to friendship)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(sharing, be to friendship)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sharing, be to friendship)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sharing, be in relationship)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sharing, be in relationship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(value, is important to study of public relations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(sharing, be in relationship)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(value, is important to study of public relations)