shark: be at australia

Related concepts

Parents	creature Weight: 0.74 , predator Weight: 0.67 , fish Weight: 0.63 , animal Weight: 0.62 , organism Weight: 0.60
Siblings	whale shark Weight: 0.84 , hammerhead shark Weight: 0.76 , dogfish Weight: 0.60 , flamingo Weight: 0.48 , dolphin Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at australia	1.00
be at beach of australia	0.93
be at new england	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(fish, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(shark, be at australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(fish, be at australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(fish, be at australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(fish, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(shark, be at australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(shark, be at australia)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(shark, be at beach of australia)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(shark, be at new england)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(shark, be at new england)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(shark, be at new england)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(shark, be at new england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(shark, be at australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(shark, be at australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(fish, be at australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(shark, be at australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(fish, be at australia)