shark: be at beach of australia

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, fish
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, organism
Weight: 0.60
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.76
, dogfish
Weight: 0.60
, flamingo
Weight: 0.48
, dolphin
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at beach of australia 1.00
be at australia 0.93
be at new smyrna beach florida 0.81
be at gulf of mexico 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fish, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fish, be at australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fish, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(shark, be at beach of australia)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(shark, be at australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(shark, be at australia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(shark, be at australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(shark, be at new smyrna beach florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(shark, be at new smyrna beach florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(shark, be at australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(shark, be at gulf of mexico)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(shark, be at new smyrna beach florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(shark, be at new smyrna beach florida)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(shark, be at gulf of mexico)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(shark, be at gulf of mexico)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shark, be at gulf of mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fish, be at australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(shark, be at beach of australia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fish, be at australia)