shark: be classified as fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, fish
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, bull shark
Weight: 0.83
, great white shark
Weight: 0.79
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.76
, manta ray
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified as fish 1.00
is fish 0.86
have fish on them 0.84
eat other fish 0.83
eat fish 0.83
find easily fish 0.82
be bigger than tuna fishes 0.81
eat humans instead of fish 0.80
be kept with other fish 0.80
be kept with fish 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(animal, eat fish)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(shark, be classified as fish)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(animal, eat fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat fish)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hammerhead shark, eat fish)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is fish)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(animal, eat fish)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(great white shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is fish)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(whale shark, is fish)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is fish)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hammerhead shark, eat fish)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hammerhead shark, eat fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(shark, be classified as fish)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(shark, eat fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(shark, eat fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(shark, is fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(shark, is fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(shark, eat humans instead of fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(shark, eat humans instead of fish)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(shark, is fish)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(shark, eat fish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(shark, is fish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shark, eat humans instead of fish)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(shark, find easily fish)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(shark, find easily fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shark, eat fish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shark, eat humans instead of fish)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(shark, find easily fish)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shark, find easily fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(shark, be classified as fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, eat fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(whale shark, is fish)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(great white shark, is fish)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hammerhead shark, eat fish)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(shark, be classified as fish)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(animal, eat fish)