shark: has physical part fins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.74
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.73
, predator
Weight: 0.67
, fish
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.84
, bull shark
Weight: 0.83
, great white shark
Weight: 0.79
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.76
, manta ray
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part fins 1.00
has physical part fin 0.89
has physical part gills 0.81
fin bad 0.80
put fin out of water 0.80
have dorsal fin 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fish, has physical part gills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shark, has physical part fins)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fish, has physical part gills)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fish, has physical part gills)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, has physical part gills)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(fish, has physical part gills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(shark, has physical part fins)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(great white shark, has physical part gills) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(great white shark, has physical part gills)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(shark, has physical part fins)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(shark, put fin out of water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(shark, put fin out of water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shark, fin bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(shark, put fin out of water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shark, fin bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shark, put fin out of water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(shark, fin bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(shark, fin bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(shark, has physical part fins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fish, has physical part gills)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(great white shark, has physical part gills)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(shark, has physical part fins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fish, has physical part gills)