sheep: has physical part horns

Related concepts

Parents	ruminant Weight: 0.66 , species Weight: 0.65 , wild animal Weight: 0.64 , animal Weight: 0.63
Siblings	llama Weight: 0.57 , ewe Weight: 0.54 , cattle Weight: 0.38 , mountain goat Weight: 0.37 , pig Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part horns	1.00
has physical part teeth	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(cattle, has physical part horns)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part horns)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(cattle, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(cattle, has physical part horns)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part horns)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(sheep, has physical part horns)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(sheep, has physical part teeth)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(sheep, has physical part teeth)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(sheep, has physical part teeth)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(sheep, has physical part horns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(mountain goat, has physical part horns)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(cattle, has physical part horns)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part horns) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)