sherpa: is better climbers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents climber
Weight: 0.49
, expedition
Weight: 0.41
, guide
Weight: 0.33
, team
Weight: 0.32
, material
Weight: 0.32
Siblings trip
Weight: 0.27
, nasturtium
Weight: 0.26
, ivy
Weight: 0.26
, basketball team
Weight: 0.25
, football team
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better climbers 1.00
is climbers 0.99
mountaineering teams 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sherpa, is better climbers)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sherpa, is climbers)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sherpa, is climbers)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, is climbers)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(sherpa, is climbers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(sherpa, mountaineering teams)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sherpa, mountaineering teams)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, mountaineering teams)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sherpa, mountaineering teams)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, is better climbers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(sherpa, is better climbers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sherpa, is better climbers)