shingle: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.54
, damage
Weight: 0.54
, condition
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.50
Siblings tile
Weight: 0.30
, surfboard
Weight: 0.30
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.30
, roof
Weight: 0.30
, flat tire
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00
be dangerous in pregnancy 0.80
be dangerous during pregnancy 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(surfboard, is dangerous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(surfboard, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(surfboard, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(shingle, is dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(shingle, be dangerous in pregnancy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(shingle, be dangerous in pregnancy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shingle, be dangerous in pregnancy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(shingle, be dangerous in pregnancy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(shingle, be dangerous during pregnancy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shingle, be dangerous during pregnancy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(shingle, be dangerous during pregnancy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shingle, be dangerous during pregnancy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(shingle, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(shingle, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(shingle, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(surfboard, is dangerous)