shipping: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.62
, company
Weight: 0.61
, price
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.58
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.34
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, banking industry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
is mixed cost 0.78
is more expensive 0.77
is expensive 0.77
is more than actual price 0.76
be expensive on shutterfly 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(software company, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(software company, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(software company, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(shipping, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(shipping, be expensive on shutterfly)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shipping, be expensive on shutterfly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shipping, be expensive on shutterfly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shipping, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shipping, be expensive on shutterfly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(shipping, is mixed cost)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(shipping, is mixed cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shipping, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shipping, is more than actual price)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(shipping, is more expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(shipping, is more than actual price)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(shipping, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(shipping, is mixed cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(shipping, is mixed cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(shipping, is more than actual price)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(shipping, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shipping, is more than actual price)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shipping, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(shipping, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(shipping, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shipping, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shipping, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(software company, is expensive)