shock: be dangerous to buildings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.66
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, electric shock
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings surprise
Weight: 0.35
, disappointment
Weight: 0.35
, anguish
Weight: 0.35
, sadness
Weight: 0.34
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to buildings 1.00
be dangerous 0.80
is dangerous 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(electric shock, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(shock, be dangerous to buildings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(electric shock, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(electric shock, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(shock, be dangerous to buildings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(shock, be dangerous to buildings)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(shock, be dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(shock, is dangerous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(shock, be dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(shock, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(shock, be dangerous)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(shock, is dangerous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(shock, be dangerous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(shock, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shock, be dangerous to buildings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(shock, be dangerous to buildings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(electric shock, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(shock, be dangerous to buildings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(electric shock, is dangerous)