shock: develop in patients with burns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.66
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, electric shock
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings surprise
Weight: 0.35
, disappointment
Weight: 0.35
, anguish
Weight: 0.35
, sadness
Weight: 0.34
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop in patients with burns 1.00
develop in patients with severe burns 0.97
develop in patients 0.88
burn 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sadness, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sadness, burn)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sadness, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(shock, develop in patients with burns)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shock, develop in patients)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(shock, develop in patients)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with burns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients with burns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with burns)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sadness, burn)