shock: develop in patients with severe burns

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.66
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, electric shock
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings surprise
Weight: 0.35
, disappointment
Weight: 0.35
, anguish
Weight: 0.35
, sadness
Weight: 0.34
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
develop in patients with severe burns 1.00
develop in patients with burns 0.97
develop in patients 0.86
occur in severe infections 0.82
burn 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sadness, burn)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sadness, burn)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sadness, burn)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients with burns)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(shock, develop in patients with burns)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(shock, develop in patients with burns)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shock, develop in patients)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(shock, develop in patients)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(shock, occur in severe infections)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with burns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(shock, occur in severe infections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(shock, occur in severe infections)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(shock, occur in severe infections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shock, develop in patients with severe burns)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sadness, burn)