shock: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.66
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, electric shock
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings surprise
Weight: 0.35
, disappointment
Weight: 0.35
, anguish
Weight: 0.35
, sadness
Weight: 0.34
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality worse 0.90
get best 0.77
have stronger 0.77
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.76
has quality advantage 0.76
get best of us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(emotion, get best of us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(emotion, get best of us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(embarrassment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sadness, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sadness, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(surprise, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality better)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(emotion, get best of us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(embarrassment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(embarrassment, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(sadness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(sadness, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(surprise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(surprise, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sadness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sadness, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(shock, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shock, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(shock, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shock, has quality worse)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shock, has quality worse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(shock, has quality worse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shock, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(emotion, get best of us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(embarrassment, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sadness, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(surprise, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sadness, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(shock, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(emotion, get best of us)