shock: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.66
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, electric shock
Weight: 0.64
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, cause
Weight: 0.60
Siblings surprise
Weight: 0.35
, disappointment
Weight: 0.35
, anguish
Weight: 0.35
, sadness
Weight: 0.34
, embarrassment
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is complicated 0.78
is attractive 0.76
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(electric shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shock, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(electric shock, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(electric shock, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sadness, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(electric shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(shock, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(sadness, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sadness, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(shock, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shock, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shock, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(electric shock, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sadness, is attractive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(shock, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(electric shock, is expensive)