shoe: be at porch

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings oxford
Weight: 0.64
, sneaker
Weight: 0.62
, clog
Weight: 0.59
, heel
Weight: 0.56
, puma
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at porch 1.00
be at front porch 0.96
be at back of sofa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(toy, be at back of sofa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(shoe, be at porch)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(toy, be at back of sofa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(toy, be at back of sofa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, be at front porch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(toy, be at back of sofa)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at porch)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sneaker, be at front porch)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sneaker, be at front porch)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(shoe, be at porch)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(shoe, be at front porch)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoe, be at front porch)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at front porch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(shoe, be at porch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toy, be at back of sofa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sneaker, be at front porch)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(shoe, be at porch)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toy, be at back of sofa)