shoe: have laces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loafer
Weight: 0.64
, oxford
Weight: 0.64
, sneaker
Weight: 0.62
, nike
Weight: 0.62
, flip flop
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
have laces 1.00
having studs on shoes 0.76
sneakers for running 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(loafer, have laces)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(loafer, have laces)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(loafer, have laces)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(shoe, have laces)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, sneakers for running)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(shoe, having studs on shoes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(shoe, sneakers for running)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(shoe, sneakers for running)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(shoe, having studs on shoes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shoe, having studs on shoes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(shoe, having studs on shoes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shoe, sneakers for running)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(shoe, have laces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(shoe, have laces)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(shoe, have laces)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(loafer, have laces)