shooting: has state first

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attack
Weight: 0.61
, accident
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, tragedy
Weight: 0.57
, police officer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings car accident
Weight: 0.33
, crash
Weight: 0.33
, assault
Weight: 0.33
, plane crash
Weight: 0.33
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state first 1.00
has state problem 0.77
has state job 0.76
be first date 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(car accident, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(car accident, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(car accident, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(assault, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(assault, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(shooting, has state first)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shooting, be first date)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(shooting, be first date)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(shooting, be first date)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shooting, be first date)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has state first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shooting, has state first)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(car accident, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(shooting, has state first)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(assault, has state problem)