shopping mall: have living trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping
Weight: 0.74
, parking lot
Weight: 0.69
, building
Weight: 0.69
, location
Weight: 0.69
Siblings department store
Weight: 0.75
, carrefour
Weight: 0.48
, shopping center
Weight: 0.39
, convenience store
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have living trees 1.00
have successful living trees 0.94
affect vegetation 0.76
have green roofs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(location, affect vegetation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(shopping mall, have living trees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(location, affect vegetation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(location, affect vegetation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(location, affect vegetation)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(shopping mall, have living trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(shopping mall, have living trees)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, have successful living trees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(shopping mall, have successful living trees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping mall, have successful living trees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping mall, have successful living trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, have living trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(shopping mall, have living trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(location, affect vegetation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(shopping mall, have living trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(location, affect vegetation)