shopping mall: is usa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping
Weight: 0.74
, parking lot
Weight: 0.69
, building
Weight: 0.69
, location
Weight: 0.69
Siblings department store
Weight: 0.75
, carrefour
Weight: 0.48
, shopping center
Weight: 0.39
, convenience store
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is usa 1.00
be in usa 0.99
is uk 0.84
is florida 0.80
be in california 0.80
is jacksonville florida 0.79
be in singapore 0.79
is miami 0.78
was important goal for george washington 0.78
is chicago 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(shopping, be in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shopping mall, is usa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(shopping, be in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, be in california)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(shopping, be in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shopping mall, is usa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(convenience store, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is usa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(convenience store, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(convenience store, be in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(convenience store, be in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(shopping mall, is usa)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is florida)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(shopping mall, is uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(shopping mall, is uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is uk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(shopping mall, is uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(shopping mall, is florida)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(shopping mall, is florida)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shopping mall, is florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shopping mall, is usa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shopping, be in singapore)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(convenience store, is usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(convenience store, is uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(convenience store, be in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(shopping mall, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shopping, be in singapore)