shopping: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.67
, attraction
Weight: 0.65
, need
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.58
Siblings gift shop
Weight: 0.69
, clothing store
Weight: 0.37
, hardware store
Weight: 0.35
, shoe store
Weight: 0.35
, food store
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be for environment 0.93
affect environment 0.87
affect natural environment 0.84
make negative impact on environment 0.83
make impact on environment 0.83
make positive impact on environment 0.83
harm environment 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
affect climate 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(activity, make negative impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(activity, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(activity, make negative impact on environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(activity, affect climate)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(activity, make negative impact on environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect climate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(activity, make negative impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(activity, affect climate)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food store, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(shopping, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(shopping, be for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(shopping, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(shopping, be for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(shopping, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(shopping, be for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shopping, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shopping, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(activity, make negative impact on environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, affect climate)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(activity, make negative impact on environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, affect climate)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(shopping, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)