short: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings long hair
Weight: 0.32
, only
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
is same price 0.91
push down stock price 0.83
be same price as pants 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(short, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(short, is same price)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(short, is same price)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(short, is same price)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(short, push down stock price)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(short, push down stock price)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(short, push down stock price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(short, be same price as pants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(short, push down stock price)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(short, is same price)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(short, be same price as pants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(short, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(short, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(short, has quality price)