shortstop: is bad hitters

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.65
, player
Weight: 0.57
, hole
Weight: 0.47
, infielder
Weight: 0.38
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.64
, catcher
Weight: 0.36
, outfielder
Weight: 0.36
, baseball player
Weight: 0.35
, second baseman
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad hitters 1.00
is hitters 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(catcher, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, is bad hitters)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(shortstop, is bad hitters)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(shortstop, is hitters)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(shortstop, is hitters)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(shortstop, is hitters)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(shortstop, is hitters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(shortstop, is bad hitters)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shortstop, is bad hitters)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(shortstop, is bad hitters) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(catcher, is bad hitters)