shot: be in low budget movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents projectile
Weight: 0.63
, photograph
Weight: 0.59
, mistake
Weight: 0.57
, story
Weight: 0.57
Siblings volley
Weight: 0.61
, forehand
Weight: 0.60
, overhead
Weight: 0.60
, blast
Weight: 0.57
, lob
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in low budget movies 1.00
be in movies 0.83
be used in films 0.78
is movie 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.04
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mistake, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shot, be in low budget movies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mistake, be in movies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mistake, be in movies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mistake, be in movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(shot, be in low budget movies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(shot, be in low budget movies)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shot, be used in films)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(shot, be used in films)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(shot, be used in films)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shot, be used in films)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shot, be in low budget movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shot, be in low budget movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mistake, be in movies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shot, be in low budget movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mistake, be in movies)